tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post6305919501255966966..comments2024-03-21T10:16:35.080-04:00Comments on Rituals of DisEnchantment: Waving Adieu, Adieu, AdieuUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger119125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-88442162947566596232010-11-03T18:21:34.449-04:002010-11-03T18:21:34.449-04:00Hi artsquiggle,
I posted about Scientific Americ...Hi artsquiggle, <br /><br />I posted about Scientific American. We share a very similar quest. I keep your thought provoking comments in mind. Will respond further to them in the more current Resurrection thread when able. Keeping it on topic of course. Nice to know someone of a similar frame of mind.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-26619816101335426842010-11-02T22:01:44.504-04:002010-11-02T22:01:44.504-04:00I'm sure getting confused by how many "An...I'm sure getting confused by how many "Anons" I am conversing with. Don't understand a thing about all this previous exSY debating. I was going to venture into that forum recently but when I saw I had to sign up with yet ANOTHER account, I just shrugged it off. I've too many accounts out there, from personal enrichment, career and consumer-related, as it is. <br /><br />Anyway, just wanted to answer a former posting:<br /><br />One of the Anons wrote in Regards to American Scientific Mind:<br />"strange, I read the whole article without a subscription. Now you need one to sign up. Sorry 'bout dat. <br /><br />Please don't be sorry. You introduced me to a website and magazine that I want to include in my repetoire of reading and study. This zine looks like a really good one. Anything relating to human development, evolution, brain science, science in general, is fascinating and helpful to my ongoing understanding of life. As a veteran "outie", I have so many ongoing questions and interests about life on this planet, this universe. Never used to have much interest in the world when I was in SY, all too consumed by my own narcissistic "devotion" and "bliss" to care about the outside realms. <br /><br />Rediscovery, new study, new interests, new or renewed hobbies & endeavors within my own humaness and the world--Another great bennie of having graduated from a lop-sided yoga. <br />Regards,<br />artsquiggleartsquigglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17952996736385901761noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-86365534757703126552010-10-31T18:17:50.881-04:002010-10-31T18:17:50.881-04:00For the record, no I don't think C is Chid. I ...For the record, no I don't think C is Chid. I was in eXSY for about six years and also in a special insiders group that C ran parallel to eXSY. I know C about as well as anyone and I know F.A. The very debate over C's gender should give you an idea how secretive C is. <br /><br />C only matters to the ex SY community because she holds the key to the eXSY group which has been the default rendezvous for people exiting SY. I have my own reasons for addressing C as 'she' which I can't reveal here. That aside, calling C 'she' does jolt your comfortable assumptions about her doesn't it?<br /><br />Gorakh<br /><br /><br />---<br /><br />C is not Chidvilisananda. That I know for sure.<br /><br />C is not who has written to this blog over the past few days.<br /><br />---<br /><br />There were some on the exsy list who started wondering (offlist) if C was a woman a couple years ago, and a few of those came to the conclusion he (or she) was. Nothing whatsoever to do with GM. No conspiracy theory, just a hunch shared by a few people after years of assuming the opposite. Don't try to make something more than that out of it. C has never identified as male or female, which is his/her perfect right.<br /><br />---<br /><br />All of this "offlist" speculation and chatting is in itself very indicitive of the clique mindset which can be found within cults.<br /><br />Some people take a long time to heal from these behavioral habits. Some people don't heal.<br /><br />---<br /><br />Don't try to make something more than that out of it. C has never identified as male or female, which is his/her perfect right.<br /><br />---<br /><br />CorrectAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-87576800108258590512010-10-31T18:06:20.639-04:002010-10-31T18:06:20.639-04:00Four key departments in cults
1. Finance
2. Lega...Four key departments in cults<br /><br />1. Finance<br /><br />2. Legal<br /><br />3. Technology<br /><br />4. Recruitment<br /><br />SY no longer has use for number 4.<br />The other three remain active.<br /><br />Cults hope members and ex-members remain uneducated in these three areas.<br /><br />Most members of cults are focused on the leader, their devotion, their seva, the practices. They are not focused on the three items.<br /><br />The business side of cults remains unexplored and not on the radar of thought for many cult members. Cults love these facts. <br /><br />Cults and their biggest supporters don't mind thinking of it as a version of "Dumb and Dumber".<br /><br />Cults and their supporters hope it continues, and will use manipulation to facilitate this reality.<br /><br />Always question when there are attempts to redirect and block these facts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-16262916544412896112010-10-31T17:23:13.882-04:002010-10-31T17:23:13.882-04:00Anon wrote: "To close, speaking this "he...Anon wrote: "To close, speaking this "he/she" bit, if I'm not mistaken I believe the reason Gorakh/Goat calls "C" a she, is that it seems he's convinced "C" stands for Chidvilasananda herself."<br /><br />----------------------------<br /><br />For the record, no I don't think C is Chid. I was in eXSY for about six years and also in a special insiders group that C ran parallel to eXSY. I know C about as well as anyone and I know F.A. The very debate over C's gender should give you an idea how secretive C is. <br /><br />C only matters to the ex SY community because she holds the key to the eXSY group which has been the default rendezvous for people exiting SY. I have my own reasons for addressing C as 'she' which I can't reveal here. That aside, calling C 'she' does jolt your comfortable assumptions about her doesn't it?<br /><br />GorakhAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-71315339827939685512010-10-31T17:17:19.393-04:002010-10-31T17:17:19.393-04:00Have to go along with the poster at 3:50PM. There ...Have to go along with the poster at 3:50PM. There were some on the exsy list who started wondering (offlist) if C was a woman a couple years ago, and a few of those came to the conclusion he (or she) was. Nothing whatsoever to do with GM. No conspiracy theory, just a hunch shared by a few people after years of assuming the opposite. Don't try to make something more than that out of it. C has never identified as male or female, which is his/her perfect right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-37031457481485577542010-10-31T15:50:38.094-04:002010-10-31T15:50:38.094-04:00Anon 9:57, that's an astounding bit of conject...Anon 9:57, that's an astounding bit of conjecture & spinning, all from one little pronoun. How about this: G and others may have become convinced that "C" is ... female. Not Chid, not Malti, just female. <br /><br />We got a lot of practice in SY in spinning whole novels from one. little. word. from the "guru," didn't we?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-27521629101039078762010-10-31T12:06:58.831-04:002010-10-31T12:06:58.831-04:00"I think it's pretty much died down, Seek..."I think it's pretty much died down, SeekHer. Seems like "C" finally may have gone away. Or is at least content to lurk."<br /><br />And here I thought reverse psychology would only work on children and dogs!SeekHerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08659121733477310544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-64648947674704755522010-10-31T09:57:35.049-04:002010-10-31T09:57:35.049-04:00I think it's pretty much died down, SeekHer.
...I think it's pretty much died down, SeekHer.<br /><br />Seems like "C" finally may have gone away. Or is at least content to lurk.<br /><br />Truly amazed me how he/she could claim "This is not C" at least twice, if not thrice. "C" truly has a unique writing style and anyone who has spent sufficient time on EXSY in the past would read it and peg the writer for "C" immediately. It's just such different writing than the average person...or even the un-average person" would typically use...that it just stands out and yells for all to hear "This is C writing this passage!"<br /><br />The attempt to hide his/her identity, here on ROD and outside the virtual walls of the site beyond which he/she owns and controls...simply left me stunned as to how out of touch "C" is with just how much his/her writing style stands out from the crowd...and potentially how divorced he/she may have become from equal-minded groundedness in reality.<br /><br />To close, speaking this "he/she" bit, if I'm not mistaken I believe the reason Gorakh/Goat calls "C" a she, is that it seems he's convinced "C" stands for Chidvilasananda herself.<br /><br />In other words, the site owner for the ex-siddha yoga site is (in Gorakh's eyes?) the leader of Siddha Yoga herself.<br /><br />While I believe that it's unlikely, and still think "C" is a male given the writing style...I must admit that as a means of spying on what the outties are saying, it would be quite the neat trick.<br /><br />As to how the logistics would work for of a commited "Outtie" like Pendragon actually selling the EXSY site to "C" for dollars (which supposedly happened) if "C" actually is Malti...or if that is the case, whatever threats were made in order for that to happen...that much is beyond me and frankly, is not something I'd necessarily really want to know more about anyway.<br /><br />This last part, it's all conjecture on my part.<br /><br />But on spooky All Hallows Eve, it's at least FUN conjecture!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-15680844961794491742010-10-30T23:09:18.927-04:002010-10-30T23:09:18.927-04:00Anon who wrote: "Could someone explain to me ...Anon who wrote: "Could someone explain to me what "loaded disclosure for those with the most to hide" means?"<br /><br />Who cares? The dialog in most horror movies is ridiculous. I suggest you focus on the dark mystical beings that stalk all exies, the metastasizing IP addresses that bloom like blood algae until they choke to death the Internet, the passive ghostly voices and the active "hacking and tagging" of what I can only assume are lifeless bodies. Not to mention the Kiwis, the pussies and the creature called Gorakh that I'm pretty sure fought Godzilla in a Japanese horror film I saw when I was twelve.<br /><br />Two more hours until Halloween and man this is getting goooooooood!SeekHerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08659121733477310544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-6793187831050652832010-10-30T20:06:01.436-04:002010-10-30T20:06:01.436-04:00Could someone explain to me what "loaded disc...Could someone explain to me what "loaded disclosure for those with the most to hide" means? I can not make head nor tails of it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-84064286019622086422010-10-30T18:50:49.799-04:002010-10-30T18:50:49.799-04:00They wanted to go where they could fully satiate t...They wanted to go where they could fully satiate their desire for lots of sex, food,revelry and self-indulgence ...so they were reborn in the West. Eventually, they tired of the whole thing and came "home" to India to reconnect with their devotion to Rama. Apparently, Nisargadatta told this tale a few times to explain why so many Westerners came to his satsangs. His given name had been "Maruti" (a common appellation for Hannuman)because he was born on Hanuman Jayanti. <br /><br /><br /><br />A transparent attempt to pawn off a make believe story on uneducated "Westerners ".<br /><br />This hype of these teachers, teachings and stories have circulated for too many decades to be taken seriously anymore.<br /><br />Now that's levity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-46287626892474571682010-10-30T18:42:52.405-04:002010-10-30T18:42:52.405-04:00Oh, freakin' BALONEY, C!!!
NOBODY ELSE WRITES ...Oh, freakin' BALONEY, C!!!<br />NOBODY ELSE WRITES LIKE YOU!!!<br /><br />Forget it...wasting my damn breath.<br />C's too much of a P**sy to come clean.<br />October 29, 2010 9:10 PM<br />By the way, C, ya got MORE than just Goatie bashin' on ya here.<br /><br />He's a Kiwi. I'm not him. Do I write like a freakin' KIWI????<br /><br />I'm an AMERICAN who's SICK of your full-of-dark-intrigue third-person passive-voice talkin' trite 1970's catchphrase writing style and YES you do know me and NO I haven't been on EXSY in quite some time because I chose to LEAVE ON MY FREAKIN' OWN beFORE you were about to ban me. Beat yer a** to the PUNCH on that one, sucka.<br /><br />Ya know what PISSES ME OFF about you MOST OF ALL, C?<br /><br />It's the fact that you're too much of a G*D DAMNED P**SY to take ANY KIND OF CRITICISM TO YOUR TYRANNICAL RULE OVER EXSY FROM ANYBODY!<br /><br />F**K, YOU MIGHT AS WELL BE FREAKIN' KIM IL SUNG OR SOMETHIN'!!!<br /><br />GO BACK TO YOUR OWN SITE!!!<br /><br />OH...yeah...I forgot. Ya got NOBODY to talk to over there anymore because you can't tolerate ANY KIND OF FREEDOM OF DISCUSSION OF ANY SORT WHATSOFREAKINEVER!!!!<br /><br />I guess ya musta got LONELY or somethin'.<br /><br /><br />I don't have a "site".<br /><br />Anger is usually a sign of acknowledgement of truth.<br /><br />Thanks for the confirmation and the attempt to misdirect what was bound to be loaded disclosure for those with the most to hide.<br /><br />BingoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-11638075957661829412010-10-30T11:44:21.779-04:002010-10-30T11:44:21.779-04:00>>"FLY AT EACH OTHER MY WINGED MONKEES!...>>"FLY AT EACH OTHER MY WINGED MONKEES!"<<<br /><br />Um, not to change the subject from ex-syda to MONKEYS!! (AHEM)..but did you ever here that story Nisargadatta used to tell? He said after the war with Ravanna depicted in the Ramayana, Rama wanted to give a reward to the bears and monkeys who had helped rescue Sita. He gave the bears what they wanted? (can't remember) and asked the monkeys what they wanted. They wanted to go where they could fully satiate their desire for lots of sex, food,revelry and self-indulgence ...so they were reborn in the West. Eventually, they tired of the whole thing and came "home" to India to reconnect with their devotion to Rama. Apparently, Nisargadatta told this tale a few times to explain why so many Westerners came to his satsangs. His given name had been "Maruti" (a common appellation for Hannuman)because he was born on Hanuman Jayanti. <br /> Thought a little levity might be welcome at this point.??<br /><br />s.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-60367724718804791812010-10-30T00:31:57.963-04:002010-10-30T00:31:57.963-04:00SeekHer,
My goodness people come and go so quickl...SeekHer,<br /><br />My goodness people come and go so quickly here!<br /><br />Hey, thanks for the last minute Halloween costume idea. A bell hop cap, snazzy rick-rack vest, furry wings and off I go! <br /><br />Used to hide behind the couch as a kid whenever those monkeys flew but thinking back can now see why her green-ness chose to rule over a fleet of them. And let's not forget the Winkies. Ah! Yet another costume idea!<br /><br />On second thought, nah . . . I'd rather fly than wink. And if the vest is too snug I'll ditch it for a pair of groovy big black specs and go as Kim Jong-il. Thanks to whoever provided that one. This is turning out to be some party!<br /><br />Counting down to November 1st . . . <br /><br />- LucidAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-10005948740793180052010-10-29T22:21:00.193-04:002010-10-29T22:21:00.193-04:00Oooh la la. Everyone, please, back to your corner...Oooh la la. Everyone, please, back to your corners. <br /><br />SY must love eXSY at this point, total confirmation of their PR that outties are all nut cases. <br /><br />Had to get that in before sanity returns in the form of SeekHer's moratorium on the eXSY topic.<br /><br />Older but wiserAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-84320103767380002542010-10-29T22:06:52.992-04:002010-10-29T22:06:52.992-04:00Wow, that felt GOOD.
Been waiting for a good coupl...Wow, that felt GOOD.<br />Been waiting for a good couple of years to give that person a piece of my mind.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-84512208479219185482010-10-29T21:18:36.762-04:002010-10-29T21:18:36.762-04:00By the way, C, ya got MORE than just Goatie bashin...By the way, C, ya got MORE than just Goatie bashin' on ya here.<br /><br />He's a Kiwi. I'm not him. Do I write like a freakin' KIWI????<br /><br />I'm an AMERICAN who's SICK of your full-of-dark-intrigue third-person passive-voice talkin' trite 1970's catchphrase writing style and YES you do know me and NO I haven't been on EXSY in quite some time because I chose to LEAVE ON MY FREAKIN' OWN beFORE you were about to ban me. Beat yer a** to the PUNCH on that one, sucka.<br /><br />Ya know what PISSES ME OFF about you MOST OF ALL, C?<br /><br />It's the fact that you're too much of a G*D DAMNED P**SY to take ANY KIND OF CRITICISM TO YOUR TYRANNICAL RULE OVER EXSY FROM ANYBODY!<br /><br />F**K, YOU MIGHT AS WELL BE FREAKIN' KIM IL SUNG OR SOMETHIN'!!!<br /><br />GO BACK TO YOUR OWN SITE!!!<br /><br />OH...yeah...I forgot. Ya got NOBODY to talk to over there anymore because you can't tolerate ANY KIND OF FREEDOM OF DISCUSSION OF ANY SORT WHATSOFREAKINEVER!!!!<br /><br />I guess ya musta got LONELY or somethin'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-77026046868413473272010-10-29T21:10:48.381-04:002010-10-29T21:10:48.381-04:00"When speaking of someone else, speaking in t..."When speaking of someone else, speaking in third person is how English works.<br /><br />I am not C, but I do know C"<br /><br />Oh, freakin' BALONEY, C!!!<br />NOBODY ELSE WRITES LIKE YOU!!!<br /><br />Forget it...wasting my damn breath.<br />C's too much of a P**sy to come clean.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-4573729484489028442010-10-29T20:59:46.614-04:002010-10-29T20:59:46.614-04:00C said: "I am not C, but I do know C"
...C said: "I am not C, but I do know C"<br /><br /><br />Again incorrect, Gorakh. But then this is your pattern.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-89709617062586832672010-10-29T20:58:20.703-04:002010-10-29T20:58:20.703-04:00There was a cat fight over at another website that...There was a cat fight over at another website that requires membership. A bunch of people left. Almost everyone else had their memberships revoked by the (ooohh, scary, boo!) troll who maintains said site. All those people now miss fighting with one another and have decided to scratch each other's eyes out over here.<br /><br />Well, mazel tov. I'd have thought they would have gotten it out of their collective system by now, but their collective system appears to be based on in-fighting so I pretty much despair of that hope.<br /><br /><br /><br />Not as I read it. There was an original comment posted where responses were left. Nothing wrong with that.<br /><br />Clarification is all that has taken place.<br /><br />No problem with this, and it has helped refresh my memory of events. It has also helped me to verify my decisions I made for moving forward.<br /><br />Thank you for that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-16188467471451518592010-10-29T20:24:58.589-04:002010-10-29T20:24:58.589-04:00TO THE READERS OF RoD:
Believe me when I say I ha...TO THE READERS OF RoD:<br /><br />Believe me when I say I have NO idea what the last 15 or so commenters have been vaporing on about; they make me question my ability to understand computers or, for that matter, written English. Here's my best guess. There was a cat fight over at another website that requires membership. A bunch of people left. Almost everyone else had their memberships revoked by the (ooohh, scary, boo!) troll who maintains said site. All those people now miss fighting with one another and have decided to scratch each other's eyes out over here.<br /><br />Well, mazel tov. I'd have thought they would have gotten it out of their collective system by now, but their collective system appears to be based on in-fighting so I pretty much despair of that hope.<br /><br />It is, however, Halloween weekend!!!! Most favorite of all favorite holidays! So, in keeping with the spirit of the day, and because I loves me a good blood bath, I'm going to make a big bucket of popcorn and watch as they keep on hacking away at each other.<br /><br />FLY AT EACH OTHER MY WINGED MONKEES! You have until the stroke of midnight on November 1st to continue your carnage---on this thread alone. After that time all comments related to eXSY will be erased, and any more that appear will be deleted as soon as I see them.<br /><br />FLY! FLY! MY PRETTIES! DO YOUR WORST AND DO IT FAST! YOUR TIME TO ON EARTH IS ENDING FAST!<br /><br />PS: any comments addressed to me or the rest of us non-ex-eXSYogis attempting to provide backstory explaining what happened over at eXSY to cause this cage match will be deleted immediately. I don't need to know what your major malfunction is or was---it's much more fun that way!SeekHerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08659121733477310544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-67616921137593484052010-10-29T18:58:42.145-04:002010-10-29T18:58:42.145-04:00C said: "I am not C, but I do know C"
...C said: "I am not C, but I do know C"<br /><br /><br />Which of the voices was this? LOL<br />Who knows anything about C? Do tell!!<br /><br />GorakhAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-16459762688006652522010-10-29T18:52:35.519-04:002010-10-29T18:52:35.519-04:00Yeah C, why are you speaking of yourself in the th...Yeah C, why are you speaking of yourself in the third person? Everyone knows its you. Be honest for a change and own your own statements. <br /><br />---<br /><br />Gorakh, I wrote to you, and I am not C.<br /><br />---<br /><br />Similarly with your rant about people posting anonymously - I've never known anyone to be less forthcoming with personal information than you. You've joined my group using a duplicate ID - the very thing you accuse others of. I really don't care but it does show how devious and dishonest you are.<br /><br />---<br /><br />After what C has discovered on eXSY, C has NO desire to join your site. Good grief, with the known hackers and all of the IDs which have been discovered, there is no chance for this possibility.<br /><br />You are 100% incorrect, Gorakh. Paranoid maybe (to borrow a phrase from you). C has never signed on to your list, and never will.<br /><br />Learned those lessons with no need to repeat them.<br /><br />---<br /><br />C said: "I was wondering when Gorakh was going to show his face. You were not accused of lying, Gorakh. You accused the owner of eXSY of being paranoid and making up the reality of being hacked and tagged."<br /><br />As usual C, you misread my words. I never said I was accused of lying. I said (in short) that I called you a liar. The sentence about you "being paranoid and making up the reality of being hacked and tagged" is accurate and I happily stand by those words.<br /><br />Gorakh - still a bad goat and LMAO :-)<br /><br />---<br /><br />Thank you for refreshing my memory of the incident, Gorakh. You are not correct, but it's good to know that your lack of understanding on what took place remains entrenched.<br /><br />Obviously, you still have no clue.<br /><br />It's very good you and C went your separate ways. I can see this now more than ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5794942461067348825.post-43914708049224853132010-10-29T18:45:15.540-04:002010-10-29T18:45:15.540-04:00"The owner of eXSY has no clue who is on your..."The owner of eXSY has no clue who is on your list and who is not"<br />(speaking of oneself in the third person)<br /><br />"what went down"<br />(A classic that immediately tags C as being C because the phrasing is so well worn)<br /><br />Could continue but it's not necessary. Just a few examples of immediate tags that identify who you are without a shadow of a doubt or a shadow of a guru.<br /><br />Why not just start writing using clear, active voice in the first person rather than passive voice in the third person?<br /><br />It would be extremely refreshing and might actually make it a little harder for the readership to identify who you really are, particularly if the usual oft-repeated clues aren't there anymore.<br /><br /><br /><br />When speaking of someone else, speaking in third person is how English works.<br /><br />I am not C, but I do know CAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com